Google Buys YouTube
That's the headline - "Google Buys YouTube!"
I admit that I can see the synergies; however, I must add that I felt YouTube was more valuable to a media company than an advertising company. After all, YouTube would have allowed the media companies another 'free' venue to push their old and popular content while building an independent advertising model. That plan describes why Newscorp (NWS.A) bought MySpace - leverage their existing media portfolio to sell ad space... something that TV and radio have done for years.
Google (GOOG), with its purchase, now enters the room from the other side. Already having a booming advertising business, but lacking the content. Ironically, YouTube lacks content too since it only recently started to forge agreements with the media companies - aka copyright holders.
Honestly, how does Google intend to make money off of this deal? After all, it will have to pay some sort of licensing fee to the media companies. Does Google honestly believe that they can charge future users to view YouTube content? Do they believe that ads alone will generate enough revenue to pay the YouTube media licenses and other operating costs?
I think the true answer lies in the field of Cisco (CSCO) and BP (BP). Both companies buy companies who are viewed as competition instead of buying companies whose assets could provide an immediate and long term boost to the bottom line. Then they hold the companies, strangle out the value, and eventually release it back to the world. In other words, basically, I believe that Google bought YouTube to shut it down. Maybe not completely... but I look for YouTube to stagnate until Google believes it can re-brand it and own the market.
I still have visions of the nightmare known as AOL-TimeWarner (TWX)... at least TimeWarner OWNED the media portfolio!
I admit that I can see the synergies; however, I must add that I felt YouTube was more valuable to a media company than an advertising company. After all, YouTube would have allowed the media companies another 'free' venue to push their old and popular content while building an independent advertising model. That plan describes why Newscorp (NWS.A) bought MySpace - leverage their existing media portfolio to sell ad space... something that TV and radio have done for years.
Google (GOOG), with its purchase, now enters the room from the other side. Already having a booming advertising business, but lacking the content. Ironically, YouTube lacks content too since it only recently started to forge agreements with the media companies - aka copyright holders.
Honestly, how does Google intend to make money off of this deal? After all, it will have to pay some sort of licensing fee to the media companies. Does Google honestly believe that they can charge future users to view YouTube content? Do they believe that ads alone will generate enough revenue to pay the YouTube media licenses and other operating costs?
I think the true answer lies in the field of Cisco (CSCO) and BP (BP). Both companies buy companies who are viewed as competition instead of buying companies whose assets could provide an immediate and long term boost to the bottom line. Then they hold the companies, strangle out the value, and eventually release it back to the world. In other words, basically, I believe that Google bought YouTube to shut it down. Maybe not completely... but I look for YouTube to stagnate until Google believes it can re-brand it and own the market.
I still have visions of the nightmare known as AOL-TimeWarner (TWX)... at least TimeWarner OWNED the media portfolio!
